A literary analysis of the jury in 12 angry men

Certainty and Doubt Themes and Colors LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Twelve Angry Men, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.

A literary analysis of the jury in 12 angry men

A literary analysis of the jury in 12 angry men

A jury of twelve men is locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy. All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the electric chair.

The judge informs the jurors that they are faced with a grave decision and that the court would not entertain any acts of mercy for the boy if found guilty. Even before the deliberation talks begin it is apparent most of the men are certain the boy is guilty.

The rest of the jury resents the inconvenience of his decision. After questioning his sanity they hastily decide to humor the juror 8 Henry Fonda by agreeing to discuss the trial for one hour.

Eventually, as the talks proceed juror 8 slowly undermines their confidence by saying that the murder weapon is widely available to anyone, and that the testimony of the key witness is suspect.

Gradually they are won over by his arguments and even the most narrow minded of his fellow jurors hesitantly agrees with him.

Their verdict is now a solid not guilty. Arriving at an unanimous not guilty verdict does not come easily. The jury encounters many difficulties in learning to communicate and deal with each other. Although the movie deals with issues relating to the process of effective communication this paper will focus of two reasons why they encounter difficulties and how they overcome them.

First, we will apply the Johari grid theory and see how it applies to their situation. If we analyze the Johari grid of each juror we see a large hidden area in the case of all of the men. Take into consideration, each man is referred to by a juror number, they do not even have the benefit of knowing each others names.

These men have never talked before. Each of them come from different situations with individual and unique experiences.

The public area consists solely of the shared information provided during the trial. Their hidden area is immense, resulting in an equally large blind area.

The public, hidden and blind areas are relatively the same for each juror before beginning the deliberation. It is the size of the unconscious area that will differ more among the men.

We will see how the contents of the unconscious area will largely affect the decision making process of some of the jurors. The information contained in the unconscious area is unrecognized, it is often the most difficult to overcome.

He levels with the others by openly admitting that he does not know if the boy killed his father and solicits feedback in order to make an accurate decision. The movie illustrates the process of leveling and soliciting feedback which can make all the difference.

The character with the largest hidden window is the boy on trial. One man in particular, Juror 3 Lee J. Cobb has a sizable unconscious area.

He has a troubled relationship with his own son that preoccupies his thoughts. This is alluded to in a conversation between juror 7 Jack Warden and himself. The broken relationship with his son preoccupies his thoughts at several times throughout the movie; he is found staring at the picture.

His interpersonal style would be classified as a blabbermouth. He is neither open or receptive. He has his opinion and loves to share it.

The net result is a large blind area. He is unwilling or unable to level with the others and is also unreceptive to any feedback.

Most likely the extent of these feelings and the effect it has on his perceptions is unconscious to him. Eventually, he finds himself the only one maintaining a vote of guilty. He feels his sense of reality is in question and it threatens him.

This puts him on the defensive.

The theme of Justice in Twelve Angry Men from LitCharts | The creators of SparkNotes

He bursts, accusing the others of being crazy. His defenses start to crumble as his unconscious emotions become visible to him.

By recognizing his unconscious emotions, essentially what he has done is level with himself.Twelve Angry Men: Summary & The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen year old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father.

A jury of twelve men is locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy. Literary Devices: Definition & Examples the jury is tied and Juror Seven is ready to give up and tell the judge they are a hung jury. Juror 12 in 12 Angry Men: Character Analysis; 12 Angry.

Twelve Angry Men Act 1 Summary & Analysis from LitCharts | The creators of SparkNotes

Literary devices 12 angry men Introduction: Rose uses the unity of both time, plot and setting to focus the audience’s attention on the deliberation process and the interaction between the jurors. Rose deliberately constructs a parallel personal story for the 3rd Juror, whose broken relationship with his year-old son, influences his decision.

What gives a literary work cultural value? What makes it a timeless reflection of a society? In this lesson, we will explore Reginald Rose's ''12 Angry Men'' and determine its cultural value in our society. LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Twelve Angry Men, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.

Reflection of American Society Justice. This is the case with Reginald Rose's 12 Angry Men. In this story, originally published in the 's, the attitudes and beliefs of the jurors can help us reflect upon our own prejudices and.

Twelve Angry Men Characters from LitCharts | The creators of SparkNotes